Thursday, December 27, 2012

USC is having a real good time


So there was some rabble rabble a couple weeks back when USC safety Tony Burnett sent a bunch of tweets (which have since been deleted) about the Sun Bowl being pretty much the worst thing in the history of ever. The Sun Bowl's executive director unsurprisingly took the high road, responding like so:
“It doesn’t bother us what people are saying before they get here. It’s what they say after they leave, after they experience El Paso (and) after they experience the hospitality.”
USC has now experienced El Paso. Or El Paso has experienced USC. Or something.

A tweet from El Paso writer Duke Keith at the official Sun Bowl dinner:


Errrrr yeah. The USC Rivals site claimed it was all because of a half-hour flight delay earlier in the day; that'd seem reasonable except, according to Keith, Georgia Tech actually got to El Paso two hours after USC and still found time to practice, shower and show up for the dinner almost a half-hour early (hence the hour between Georgia Tech's arrival and departure with no sign of anybody from USC, which Rivals reported was only a half-hour late). And if USC had "kept the Sun Bowl officials apprised all the way," wouldn't somebody have, I dunno, mentioned something to Georgia Tech instead of letting it turn into a huge thing?

Actually, it still wouldn't have been a huge thing if not for the aforementioned tweets from Burnett and then this since-deleted tweet from defensive end Leonard Williams ...


... that amazingly was sent the day after the dinner shenanigans and therefore almost two weeks after Burnett had to apologize for doing pretty much the exact same thing. USC!

I don't even know whether I'm more amazed by USC's terrible-ness at public relations or the fact that USC is still favored by either, 9, 9.5 or 10 points, depending on your Vegas locale; I'm leaning toward the latter. Srsly. Just look at Lane Kiffin's face in the photo at the top of this post; at this point, I'd throw down $20 on USC not even showing up.

Best. Christmas present. EVER.

I debated posting a picture of that stupid shirt Jimmy Clausen's been tweeting about or the even-stupider variations of said shirt, which I won't bother linking to here, but prefer this as national championship game content-type stuff since ... I mean ... just watch it:


That hug? Yeah. I bet that guy (a) hadn't reacted to a gift like that since he was under the age of 10 and (b) won't remove that hat at any time until at least January 8 (and with good reason). Let this be a reminder that there are oases of heartwarming goodness in the vast ocean of awfulness that is user-submitted YouTube content. And in the spirit of giving, may Nick Saban not leave for the Browns until after the game.

Related revelation: Getting old means the kids are supposed to get you awesome, emotion-inducing gifts rather than the other way around. /forwards video to son's not-yet-existent email address postdated circa 2047

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Merry Christmas


 I should have something poetic or witty to write here but don't because I apparently can't think coherently after engorging myself on approximately 37 dessert-type items in one evening. Enjoy your holiday (hopefully) filled with similar engorgement and gifts and family and whatnot; I'll do the same and be back at it later in the week.

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Boise State indecision and Big Ten ginormity


So Boise State is considering not going to the Big East because obviously; CBS is reportedly willing to renegotiate the Mountain West's TV deal if Boise sticks around, and if the Mountain West can get a deal that's comparable to the Big East's, there's no reason to sign up to be part of a conference that's no longer any more relevant than the Mountain West, has the stability of plutonium and makes zero sense for Boise from a geographical/historical standpoint.

I kinda wrote about this last week. Really, the only new newsy-type stuff is as follows: (a) the Big East "is having a hard time putting together a long-term television contract" because it's a flaming pile of meh and (b) Boise is demanding ridiculous things like control of home-game TV rights to find out which conference is more desperate (that might be a push). The former item would seem to swing the pendulum toward the Mountain West, whereas the latter item would seem to swing the pendulum toward the conference that has no cojones (so probably the Big East). Other than that, nothing's really changed. If the financial situation looks better in the Big East, Boise will be in the Big East; if the financial situation looks better in the Mountain West, Boise will stay in the Mountain West. Honestly, I'm not particularly interested in the details of the negotiations..

What I am interested in is this, which has been pretty widely speculated about ever since the Rutgers/Maryland weirdness but is apparently being talked about openly among administrators at various schools:
The remaining Mountain West members are attempting to convince Boise State that it would have more security staying put rather than going to a conference that could still lose two key members in Cincinnati and UConn if there is more movement by the Big Ten and ACC. Cincinnati and UConn were public about their desire to join the ACC, but Louisville was chosen over the two rivals.

At this point, both schools have to stay in the Big East, but sources at Cincinnati and UConn are under the impression, even if it's not known to be true yet, that the Big Ten will raid the ACC for two more schools -- North Carolina and Georgia Tech.

Both Cincinnati and UConn sources have said they ultimately think their schools will be in the ACC. 
Wishful thinking? Maybe. Believable? Yes.

I don't think anybody really thinks the Big Ten is gonna stick with 14 teams since having 14 teams makes no sense, and since the goal is apparently to have an exclusive-to-nerds conference local to as many ginormous markets as possible (with expansion preferably venturing into SEC country since that's the one part of the East Coast the Big Ten has yet to annex), I'll be pretty surprised if Georgia Tech isn't part of the Big Ten at some point in the next few years. Pretty much all the same stuff that applies to Georgia Tech applies to North Carolina, although the administration there might be a little harder to persuade to give up the whole ACC/Duke/basketball thing. Something about the persuasive power of money goes here.

Whether this scenario would be good or bad for the Big Ten doesn't really matter. It'd be money. But from a not-an-accountant's perspective, it'd also allow for something closer to this and therefore be fine with me (going to 14 was a bastardizing of the conference that can't be fixed without MOAR EXPANSION):
THE BIG TEN

Michigan
Michigan State
Ohio State
Iowa
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Nebraska
Indiana
Northwestern
Illinois
THE BIG TEN, TOO

Penn State
Maryland
Rutgers
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Pitt
Syracuse
Louisville
Clemson
Boston College
Crossover games shmossover games.

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Just go to the Rose Bowl every year, hokay?


Wisconsin has a coach; that coach isn't Barry Alvarez. To the interwebz!
Utah State's Gary Andersen, who guided the Aggies to their first bowl victory in 19 years, will be named Wisconsin's new coach, sources told ESPN.

The earliest a state job in Wisconsin can be filled is two weeks after the job's posting, meaning Andersen can't be officially announced by the school until Thursday. Andersen interviewed with Wisconsin on Monday.

The Wisconsin State Journal reported Tuesday that two sources close to the Badgers program said Andersen was athletic director Barry Alvarez's top choice to succeed Bret Bielema, who left to take the Arkansas job.
So that was unexpected. Andersen (a) withdrew from consideration for the Cal job like a week ago and (b) has no particular ties to the Midwest (or really anywhere other than the state of Utah), so the various lists of hypothetical candidates for the Wisconsin job definitely included a lot of dudes but a total of zero references to Gary Andersen.

BTW, it's worth mentioning that Andersen wasn't Alvarez's "top choice" in a literal sense: Mike Riley, Al Golden and Mel Tucker (the Jaguars' defensive coordinator and a former Wisconsin player) all were contacted but declined interest. Still, the reaction has been an amazingly positive one considering the guy has a 30-31 career record, probably in part because the Wisconsin fan base had accepted defeat (as in "who's left in the MAC?") before the Andersen news started leaking and in part because said 30-31 record isn't really a negative.

The reason for that: Holy hell Utah State was terrible when Andersen got there in '08. I mean terrible. Zero winning records since 1997, nothing better than 3-9 since 2002 (!), a 9-38 record under predecessor Brent Guy and an Idaho-esque .359 winning percentage since moving up to Division I about a decade ago. Terrible.

Andersen took the job after four years as Utah's D-coordinator -- he was promoted to take over for Kyle Whittingham after Whittingham was promoted to take over for Urban Meyer -- and went from 4-8 to 4-8 to 7-6 to 11-2, with this year's two losses by one to Wisconsin (oh hai) and three to BYU.

An amazing quote from a Utah State beat writer (those apparently exist):
"It's a program that was literally a dumpster fire for years until Gary Andersen got there and was able to turn it around," Graham said. "To take a program that went 19 years without a bowl win and in his fourth year there (finish) 11-2 and five points away from being in the BCS in Logan, Utah, which is really in the middle of nowhere — to be able to pull that off is something else."
Indeed. And the reason for that improvement was a comparable improvement on defense, hence Andersen, a former D-coordinator, being of interest to the Cals and Wisconsins of the world. Utah State's numbers in Andersen's four years were as follows: 113th in yardage and 107th in scoring in 2009, 100th and 101st in 2010, 50th and 68th in 2011 and 15th and eighth (!) this year, with only two teams on the schedule (San Jose State and Louisiana Tech, two teams that finished a combined 19-5) scoring more than 20 points. FWIW, Utah State also held Wisconsin to 16 points and 234 total yards, Wiscy's second-lowest output of the season (although that was in the dark days before Matt Canada and the O-line seemingly had any idea what was going on).

And going back a little further, Utah's defenses under Andersen finished like so: 47th in yards and 59th in scoring in 2005, 43rd and 37th in '06, 18th and fifth in '07 and 12th and 11th in '08. So yeah: Andersen knows how to develop a defense. Not disputable.

What makes him something other than the "home run hire" a lot of people are claiming him to be is the other stuff (or lack thereof). The meaingful portion of Andersen's coaching career has consisted entirely of four years at Utah State (he also had a year at Southern Utah), which is really not comparable in any way to Wisconsin. I mean, logic dictates that anybody who can succeed at Blah Program X can obviously succeed at Way Better Program Y, but it doesn't always work out that way in reality.

There are really two questions. The first: What's gonna happen with the offense? Utah State was running something resembling a spread, albeit a run-biased one, whereas Barry Alvarez said at his post-Bielema-WTF presser something along the lines of "haha spread no." So Wisconsin probably won't be doing what Utah State was doing, and with Utah State O-coordinator Matt Wells getting the head coaching job there and Canada going to NC State, Andersen will have to piece together a staff (probably based on Alvarez's recommendation) to run an offense somewhat unlike the ones he's overseen thus far in his career.

That said, Andersen is philosophically not unlike Alvarez/Bielema; he likee the run (just spreading to run instead of MANBALLING to run). Here's a useful chart that pretty well demonstrates the Wisconsin-ness of the Utah State offense:


The uncertainty lies in the implementation of that philosophy and the amalgamation of a staff. Rumor has is that Andersen is retaining his O-line coach from Utah State; whether that works with whatever the yet-unnamed O-coordinator wants to do remains to be seen. I'm somewhat skeptical that the Wisconsin running game will still be the Wisconsin running game (as it's recognized right now) a few years from now, if only because there isn't really any evidence that Andersen is totally committed to that type of power run game built around an O-line made up entirely of bear-sized humans. That doesn't necessarily mean it won't be good (Utah State's running game averaged a final ranking of 23rd nationally); it just means there'll be some systemic transition of some degree that may or may not go awesomely.

The second: Was Andersen's success over the last two years more a result of him being an amazeballs coach or more the result of him being a good D-coordinator in a craptacularly awful conference? Really, there's not a lot in the way of data to differentiate Andersen from the various hires of late who rebuilt their various MAC/WAC programs from crappy to decent to (relatively) very good. And it's one thing for Colorado to give a couple million bucks to the guy who built San Jose State into something respectable since doing the same at Colorado would represent improvement at this point; it's another thing for Wisconsin to do it since the standard at Wisconsin is, like, a lot higher these days. As I mentioned a few grafs ago, there's obviously a difference between turning a bad program into a pretty decent one and maintaining a borderline-elite program, especially one that might have already plateaued. I mean, even if Andersen is an amazeballs coach, three straight Rose Bowls might never, ever happen again for Wisconsin, so being the guy to follow the guy who literally just did seems suboptimal. And that's a real "if" given the small sample size of data (one excellent year of debatable relevance to Wisconsin) for that hypothesis.

There's probably something to be written here about Arkansas getting the guy with all the Rose Bowls and Wisconsin celebrating about getting the guy with the 30-31 career record. That something: You win, SEC. You always win. The money always wins.

As for Wisconsin, if nothing else, a defense that's been good to very good for most of my adult life should continue being good to very good (or better), and that alone should allow for some leeway in terms of figuring out an identity on offense and developing some recruiting connections outside the state of Utah and whatnot. So that'll help; it's just doubtful that it'll help enough to keep Wisconsin at a double-digit-wins-almost-every-year level since even the guy who had been doing that didn't particularly like his chances of continuing to do it at Wisconsin. Really, just doing something resembling that going forward would be pretty impressive considering the recruiting vacuums that are the Ohio State and Michigan staffs.

On the plus side, there's this, which probably doesn't really mean anything except that Andersen is a better person than most persons who do what he does:
On Tuesday, Andersen began calling his Utah State players, one by one. ... ince Utah State was on holiday break, most of the players didn't return to the Logan campus after the bowl game. So there was no opportunity for Andersen to address his status at a team meeting.

His biggest concern was "they're going to learn about it through ESPN.''

Although it was out of his control at that point, he didn't want them to hear it that way.

"So I reached out to them -- 107 times,'' he said of his individual calls to each player on the roster.
Upshot: Gary Andersen is 107 times more likable than Bret Bielema, so in the somewhat-unlikely event that he's able to continue doing what Wisconsin's been doing of late (or in the much more likely event that Wisconsin stays good but not quite that good), it will be slightly more palatable for me. And that's really the most important thing.

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Make it (and by 'it' I mean 'Dave Brandon') stop

Unsurprisingly, Michigan will be wearing UNIFORMZ in the Outback Bowl. Unsurprisingly, said UNIFORMZ will be the worst things ever since Michigan's alternate unis are required via the Adidas contract to always be the worst things ever.

Pictures:


Sigh. The details don't even matter anymore; I have no interest in trying to parse out whether these are the exact inverse of the terrible unis from the Alabama game or whether I'll actually be able to see yellow numbers on white jerseys or whether the helmets are tolerable.

As of the Outback Bowl*, Michigan will have worn eight different uniforms over the last two years. Eight. Eight! AAARRRGHGHGH. Basically everything that makes Michigan Michigan has been sold out in the name of selling some terrible, awful, no good, very bad jerseys, presumably to people who don't really care about whether Michigan is Michigan. I mean, what better way to build a brand than by doing everything possible to appeal to the people who don't care about the things that turned the brand into something meaningful in the first place and in the process doing everything possible to alienate the people who do? Wooooo business!

Michigan has arguably the best, most recognizable uniforms in existence. Wearing them would be f#%$ing swell. The end.

*Michigan is the designated home team and thus had the option to wear the blue jerseys that are, you know, identifiable as being Michigan's. Instead, these. HEAD ASPLODE.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Catching up hires ALL OF THE COACHES


You're hired, generic son of legendary coach: Amazingly, Skip Holtz might end up being the only coach among those fired this offseason to get rehired this offseason; Louisiana Tech picked him up Friday to replace Sonny Dykes (and coach in only the best-est bowl games).

All things considered, Holtz could have done a lot worse for himself since Louisiana Tech is an OK program (albeit in Conference USA, which is the new WAC since the Big East is the new Conference USA) that's generated big-time-ish jobs for both of its last two coaches. The question is whether Louisiana Tech could have done any better; Holtz is more of a manager type than a playcaller type, and his management at South Florida was terrible since USF went from pretty good when he took over to pretty awful by the time he got fired, going 2-14 in Big East play over the last two years with an offense that was flat-out unwatchable despite Holtz allegedly having been a Division I coordinator at one point. That said, he won two Conference USA titles at East Carolina right before going to USF and did reasonably well at UConn before that, and his overall record is a respectable 88-71. Also, Louisiana Tech is still Louisiana Tech, one 9-3 season notwithstanding.

An absolutely perfect quote from Louisiana Tech president Dan Reneau at Holtz's introductory presser:
"The success he has had throughout his career as a head coach is solid."
Solid. Buy your season tickets now! I'm pretty skeptical that Holtz will be able to maintain anything resembling an eight-/nine-win pace but don't see any reason Tech can't be a regular bowl team (insert joke here) in Conference USA as long as the offense is closer to the Dykes version than the Holtz-at-USF version.

Because why not: Temple has a coach (a new one for the third time in four years):
Temple has hired New York Giants assistant Matt Rhule as its next head coach.

Rhule, 37, an assistant at Temple before joining the Giants as assistant offensive line coach in March, was one of the final two candidates for the job. University of Miami defensive coordinator Mark D'Onofrio withdrew from consideration, according to The Associated Press.
Woo assistant offensive line coach! Really, what's way more relevant than what he was doing with the Giants is what he had been doing with Temple: Rhule was quarterbacks coach/offensive coordinator for the previous six years before this one, and he actually interviewed for the head coaching job in 2011 before Steve Addazio somehow Red Bull-ed his way into getting hired.

Statistically, the numbers in that time were pretty uninspiring, but (a) Temple was TERRIBLE when Rhule showed up with Al Golden and (b) there was linear improvement from "holy hell" to "average," which means something given the terribleness.

A useful bit of information from ESPN's Andrea Adelson:
When (Rhule) spent time as recruiting coordinator during the 2006 and 2007 seasons, Temple's classes ranked No. 1 in the MAC. In 2008, as well. There is nobody out there better acquainted with what it takes to win at Temple and what is needed to win at Temple.
The only thing: That was in the MAC. Temple's in the Big East now, which ... uhhh ... never mind. But still, Temple went 4-7 overall and 2-5 in the Big East this year and has basically none of the things that inherently generate success. In that regard, Rhule at least knows what he's getting into; the question is whether he can do anything about it and keep Temple relevant-ish rather than whatever Temple was for the many years before Golden got there.


Ummm P.J. Fleck?!? Western Michigan likes 'em young:
Western Michigan has hired 32-year-old Tampa Bay Buccaneers assistant P.J. Fleck, making him the youngest coach in the Football Bowl Subdivision, according to a person familiar with the decision.

Fleck has worked for Bucs coach Greg Schiano the past three years. Fleck was the receivers coach at Rutgers for two years before following Schiano to Tampa Bay this season to do the same job.

Fleck played receiver for Northern Illinois from 1999-2003 and spent two season in the NFL with the San Francisco 49ers before starting his coaching career as a graduate assistant at Ohio State under Jim Tressel in 2006.
Great googly moogly. I remember P.J. Fleck. I'm so old.

Anyway, Western Michigan was pretty consistently one of the better programs in the MAC for the last decade under Bill Cubit; the problem was that being "one of the better programs in the MAC" yielded zero MAC title game appearances and obviously zero MAC titles, hence Cubit getting fired last month after a 4-8 season with an overall record of 51-47.

Fleck's obviously worked under some pretty decent coaches but has done so for all of, like, six years. He's basically the MAC version of Kliff Kingsbury except without the playcalling experience; he's done nothing other than coach receivers, although I assume he's amazing as a recruiter since he's basically the same age as the dude he's recruiting (which makes him the opposite of Cubit, who's 59).

Whether that translates to actual coaching-type stuff is unknown. I mean, there isn't even any data to parse through. And if it doesn't, he probably be at Western Michigan very long since the administration is setting the bar pretty high (like at "MAC title or bust"). So win some MAC titles, man who's basically the same age as me.

More MACtion: Kent State is replacing Darrell Hazell with a guy who looks a lot like Darrell Hazell:
Paul Haynes, who spent last season as Arkansas' defensive coordinator, will be named Kent State's coach Tuesday, a source told ESPN's Brett McMurphy.

Haynes is an alum of Kent State, where he walked on as a defensive back in 1987. He played four seasons and finished as the school's seventh all-time leading tackler.

Before joining Arkansas in 2011, he was an assistant for seven seasons at Ohio State as the Buckeyes' defensive backs coach from 2005-10. He also was an assistant at Louisville and Michigan State.
The Arkansas defense definitely regressed some this year, but whether that was more due to Haynes' playcalling inexperience or the general tire fire that was all things Arkansas is hard to say. I remember him being pretty highly regarded as a defensive backs coach, and I imagine that he's done a decent amount of recruiting in Ohio (obviously). In that regard, he's basically Darrell Hazell: Hazell was receivers coach and assistant head coach at Ohio State before getting the Kent State job, so I guess Kent State is just going back to the same well and hoping for the same awesomeness.

That said, anything resembling the same level of awesomeness is pretty unlikely; Kent State has won conference title ever (!), that coming in 1972, and really hadn't been good at any point in my lifetime prior to this year. Just finishing above .500 on a fairly regular basis would qualify as success and probably result in Haynes getting whatever random Big Ten/Big East job is open a couple years from now.

San Jose State has a coach: It's a guy you've never heard of:
San Jose State has hired Ron Caragher as its new head coach, the school announced on Monday via press release.

Caragher has spent the last six seasons as the head coach at the University of San Diego. He'll replace Mike MacIntyre, who left to take over at Colorado a week ago.
FYI, Caragher went 44-22 in five years at San Diego (the FCS one) after Jim Harbaugh left; he presumably has at least somewhat of a coaching/recruiting network in the California area, which along with his way-above-.500 record probably made him a relatively attractive candidate for a program that may or may not be in the FBS in five years despite being ranked right now. He also was a receivers coach at UCLA and a running backs coach at Kentucky before getting the San Diego job, so there's some FBS experience extant, which yay.

Beyond that, I have no reaction. It's San Jose State; Caragher will either do relatively well (anything above .500, basically) and get a better job in about three years or do poorly and go unnoticed since it's San Jose State.


Florida State has a D-coordinator: According to the internet, that D-coordinator is Jeremy Pruitt, currently Alabama's defensive backs coach. This is everything you need to know about Pruitt: He's 37, he's been at Alabama for two years (before which time he was a high school D-coordinator at powerhouse Hoover in Alabama) and he was hired in 2007 as "director of player development," aka "guy who doesn't really do anything except recruit because he knows all the high school coaches." There is one of these guys on every staff; trust me.

So whether he's actually a good coach is pretty hard to say. I mean, yeah, Alabama's secondary is awesome; Alabama's secondary also had about eleventeen All-Americans when Pruitt got there and is largely coached by Nick Saban. A very apt assessment from Tomahawk Nation:
There are a couple of ways one can view the promotion. One is that Saban has to trust Pruitt well enough to let him coach defensive backs.

Another view is that Saban is still very hands-on with the defensive backs, which are his specialty, as is Alabama defensive coordinator Kirby Smart, and that Pruitt might be on Alabama's staff to be a recruiter more than anything.

The truth is probably somewhere in the middle. Alabama's defenses have been great while Pruitt has been there, but also great before he arrived. And there is almost no way to separate the play of Alabama's defensive backs and attribute certain things to Pruitt and not Saban.

What is a fact, however is that Pruitt has no experience as a defensive coordinator at any level of college or pro football. He does have experience as a defensive coordinator at a very high level of high school football, but the amount of game planning and complexity of attack changes a bit in college.
Considering the pure volume of talent at Florida State right now and the amount of money that was reportedly offered to Ellis Johnson (something like $800K a year) before he took the D-coordinator job at Auburn, I don't think there's any doubt Jimbo Fisher could have found somebody with, like, an actual track record if he'd wanted one. So hiring the 37-year-old with zero relevant experience seems ... I dunno .. risky? Nonsensical? Something?

It's unlikely that the guy's gonna be able to maintain the typical level of awesomeness Mark Stoops established, but there must be an assumption that he either (a) is so good as a recruiter that the increase in talent will make up for any difference in coaching ability (unlikely) or (b) gleaned so much from Nick Saban/Kirby Smart that he's become an elite D-coordinator despite not actually being one. I'm guessing it's more of the latter since Pruitt was allegedly in line to take over at Bama if Smart had gotten a head coaching job; an endorsement from Saban as being ready to be a D-coordinator is as good an endorsement as any, I suppose. So still risky but less nonsensical, basically.

I blame Lane Kiffin for no reason: According to the twitters, Tennessee has new helmets:


If this were Facebook, I would like that photo so, so hard. I'm all in favor of tweaking uniforms/helmets/whatever to incorporate more traditionally identifiable things like Tennessee's endzone checkerboard, which might be the most identifiable endzone thing in existence; basically, that helmet is even more units of Tennessee than the old helmet. What I'm not in favor of is randomly turning everything black/matte/chrome/whatever because black/matte/chrome/whatever is the coolest. That and whatever Maryland's been doing.

Wiscaansin problems: The problem with looking for a coach after everybody else has already hired one: You're also gonna be looking for most of a staff since the one you had will probably be pretty thoroughly picked apart. To be more specific:
Several Wisconsin assistants are making moves or considering them as the school's search for a head coach continues.

One of those assistants, offensive coordinator Matt Canada, has made his decision. He'll be joining NC State in the same capacity.

Canada reunites with Dave Doeren, whom he worked for at Northern Illinois in 2011.
So Wisconsin is now down both coordinators and four position coaches and apparently isn't that close to finishing its coaching search based on what Barry Alvarez has been saying. I don't really have anything else to add here -- obviously, finding the right coach is the most important thing, regardless of the time frame -- but here's a valid line from Tom Fornelli at CBS Sports:
The problem here is that even if Alvarez finds the guy he wants for the job, at this point in the game it could be harder for that new coach to find the assistants he wants. The coaching carousel only spins for so long before it's time for everybody to get back to work.
Indeed. On a related noted, there have been some credible interwebz reports that Barry Alvarez is intrigued by the idea of coaching again and would like to subscribe to its newsletter. But these words ...
"I have one more to visit with, and then we'll sit down and decide on the best person. I feel good about the candidates we've interviewed. ... I'll hire a good coach."
... doesn't sound like those of a guy who's considering hiring himself.

Nottingham be gone: Brett Nottingham apparently isn't a huge fan of sitting on the bench at Stanford behind a redshirt freshman:
Stanford football coach David Shaw announced Saturday that junior quarterback Brett Nottingham plans to transfer.

Shaw said during practice that Nottingham would be leaving the eighth-ranked Cardinal (11-2), who won the Pac-12 title and will play Big Ten champion Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl on Jan. 1.
Nottingham was the nominal backup last year behind Andrew Luck but got beat out by Josh Nunes and then Kevin Hogan this year despite a recruiting profile with many, many stars. All told, he's thrown 16 passes in his career, going 5 for 8 in each of the last two years. The sample size: It's small. Really, all that's known is that he was roughly the equivalent of the two other guys at Stanford who've been OK but not great (although Hogan might turn out to be pretty good based on his similarly small sample size).

He should have some options, though, based on his presumed awesomeness coming out of high school. Blockquote above notwithstanding, he's actually a redshirt sophomore, so if he goes the FBS route (which seems likely), he'll have to sit out 2013 and then will have one year of eligibility left afterward. No word yet as to whether that's what he intends to do; if it is, I assume Bret Bielema will be interested.

Errr what? A.J. McCarron's chest tattoo is more amazing than ever:


I don't even know, man.
Powered by Blogger.